Do I have to call him sir?
No. Not sir, not anything else. This gets asked so often because the internet is full of people announcing rules they made up, and a beginner has no way of telling those apart from things that actually matter.
Consenting adults only. Everything on this page is about adults over 18 who have freely agreed to it.
In short
- Titles are negotiated, never compulsory. There is no rule anywhere requiring one.
- Plenty of experienced people find them embarrassing and use first names throughout.
- The useful version of a title is a marker that a scene has started, and other things do that job just as well.
- Anyone who insists on a title before you have met, or demands one online, is not describing a dynamic.
No. Not sir, not ma'am, not anything. Forms of address are one of the many things two consenting adults over 18 decide between themselves, and there is no authority anywhere that requires one.
I have played happily for years with people I called by their first name throughout, and I have been called by mine while doing things that were anything but casual. The word is not what makes it work.
Where the idea comes from
Partly from fiction, where a title is a fast way of showing a reader what sort of relationship they are looking at. Partly from older leather traditions where forms of address were part of a genuine subculture with its own etiquette. And partly from strangers on the internet who have discovered that announcing protocol is an easy way to sound experienced.
In British spanking circles specifically, the domestic register has produced its own vocabulary, so you will hear sir and quite a lot of first names with a particular emphasis. None of it is standardised and none of it is required.
What a title is actually for
When it works, it is doing one job: marking that the ordinary relationship has paused and a different one is running. It is a verbal switch, and switches are genuinely useful, because most people need something to tell them the evening has changed gear.
That is a real function and a useful one. It is just not the only thing that can perform it. A change of room. A change of clothes. Being told to stand up. Being addressed by full name. Silence. All of these mark a transition, and some of them do it more strongly than a word does. See setting and space.
Alternatives that do the same work
- First names, said differently. The same name in a flatter, slower voice is remarkably effective and requires no vocabulary at all.
- Full name, or surname. "Ms Hargreaves" or just a surname carries the formal register without anybody having to say sir.
- Nothing. Speak to them, do not name them. Plenty of scenes run entirely without either person using a name and nobody notices until afterwards.
- A title only in one direction. Some pairs have the top use a formal address for the receiver and not the reverse, which is a nice inversion and works well in office and interview scenarios.
- A title only at specific moments. Used once, at the start and at the end, rather than every sentence. This is the version I like most, because constant use wears the word out.
If you find it silly
You are in large company. A great many people cannot say sir without hearing how it sounds, and the self-consciousness pulls them straight out of whatever was building. Trying to force through that usually produces the nervous laughing described on what if I laugh.
So say so during negotiation. "I would rather use your name" is a complete sentence. Nobody experienced will mind, and if they do mind, you have learned something useful for the price of one awkward moment.
It is also worth trying once before deciding, in fairness. Some people who are certain they will hate it find that in the middle of a scene, with the room already changed, it lands quite differently from how it sounds in a text message on a Wednesday afternoon.
The version that is a warning sign
There is a specific pattern worth naming. Somebody you have never met insists on a title from the first message, corrects you when you use their name, and treats compliance as a test you are passing or failing before any negotiation has happened.
That is not a dynamic. Authority in this is something two people agree to construct, not something one person announces at a stranger. Anyone doing it to you unilaterally is either play-acting at somebody else's expense or running a script that will not improve once you are in a room with them. See red flags.
The question arrives with a him in it about nine times out of ten and it does not need to. Women top, men receive, and plenty of people do both. Whatever you land on, it should fit the actual pair of you rather than a template borrowed from somewhere else.
The short version
Use a title if you both want one, drop it if either of you does not, and change your mind later if it stops fitting. It is a costume for the voice, and costumes are optional.
Common questions
Do you have to call a dominant sir?
No. Forms of address are negotiated like everything else, and a great many people use first names or nothing at all. Titles work for some people and feel absurd to others, and neither reaction is a sign of doing it wrong.
How do you tell a partner you do not want to use a title?
Say it during negotiation, plainly and without apology: "I would rather use your name, titles make me feel silly." A reasonable partner will say fine. If a title is genuinely important to them, that is a preference to discuss, not an instruction you have to accept.